Skip to content
AxiomLogicaSearch
Category

AI & ML

All about AI and Machine Learning, Latest articles, advances in domain.

All articles

FSDP vs DeepSpeed in Accelerate: how to choose sharding, offload, and checkpointing settings
AI & ML

FSDP vs DeepSpeed in Accelerate: how to choose sharding, offload, and checkpointing settings

Accelerate maps FSDP FULL_SHARD to DeepSpeed ZeRO stage 3, but the two stacks diverge on offload and checkpointing: FSDP is all-or-nothing for offload, while DeepSpeed can split parameter and optimizer offload and even target NVMe — but FSDP can checkpoint sharded state directly, whereas ZeRO-3 often needs a consolidation or post-conversion step, which changes the operational cost of saving 70B fine-tunes.

20 min read
How to extend a Llama or Qwen context window with YaRN in vLLM: a step-by-step deployment guide
AI & ML

How to extend a Llama or Qwen context window with YaRN in vLLM: a step-by-step deployment guide

vLLM’s Qwen deployment docs explicitly recommend RoPE scaling for context lengths beyond the pretrained 32,768-token limit and validate YaRN for length extrapolation — but the exact scaling knobs must be matched to the model’s original max position embeddings and sampling/runtime settings, or the model can silently degrade even if it accepts longer prompts.

18 min read
S-LoRA vs LoRAX vs vLLM PEFT: which multi-adapter serving stack fits your workload?
AI & ML

S-LoRA vs LoRAX vs vLLM PEFT: which multi-adapter serving stack fits your workload?

S-LoRA is optimized for high-scale multi-adapter serving through unified paging and heterogeneous batching, LoRAX is designed for thousands of adapters with dynamic loading and production features, and vLLM PEFT is the lighter-weight option when you want vLLM’s serving stack with adapter support but not the most aggressive multi-adapter specialization.

20 min read
Should teams buy curated preference data or build an in-house curation pipeline?
AI & ML

Should teams buy curated preference data or build an in-house curation pipeline?

Buying curated preference data reduces internal labeling and curation labor, but the trade-off is vendor dependency and less control over sampling and rubric design — in practice, teams should expect the cheapest path to be purchase for experimentation and the best path to be build when they need domain-specific preference signals, auditability, or iterative rubric changes.

24 min read
How to merge multiple fine-tuned LLMs with mergekit: a practical tutorial
AI & ML

How to merge multiple fine-tuned LLMs with mergekit: a practical tutorial

mergekit can run entirely on CPU or with as little as 8 GB VRAM and still perform multi-model merges out of core — this makes low-cost experimentation feasible — but quality still depends on choosing compatible checkpoints and the right merge method, not just averaging weights.

19 min read

The weekly brief.

One email each Sunday with what we tested, what we'd buy, and what to skip. No filler.